Select country
Refine my search

We’re calling on NHS Trusts across England to correctly follow national guidelines, to ensure doctors are treated fairly during disciplinary proceedings.

Failure to conduct disciplinary processes swiftly and fairly can also perpetuate a culture of fear amongst doctors in the NHS. This also works against improving patient safety.

Openness and learning in the NHS relies on doctors having confidence in senior management and their commitment to due process, which further underlines why it is so important to get this right.

The scale of the problem

We recently surveyed a group of Medical Protection members who have experienced a disciplinary during the past seven years.

Of the findings, some of the key takeaways were:

  • 53% said that the disciplinary investigation against them lasted over 1 year - 22% said the process was over 2 years.
  • 80% said the disciplinary investigation had a detrimental impact on their mental health
  • 44% said that they experienced suicidal thoughts during the investigation
  • 72% said it affected their personal lives
  • 75% said the length of the investigation affected their mental health
  • 81% said feeling 'guilty until proven innocent' affected their mental health
  • 85% said the malicious nature of the allegation significantly impacted their mental health
  • 18% either chose to retire early or had no choice but to retire early
  • 24% either left the Trust, or had no choice but to leave the Trust
  • 13% considered leaving the medical profession due to their experience.

We also conducted a Freedom of Information request to NHS Trusts in England, to which 86 Trusts responded. About their approach to disciplinary processes, Trusts told us:

  • Disciplinary processes took an average 222 days.
  • The duration of disciplinary processes varied significantly: the quickest was 1 day, several took over two years, and the longest took 2,437 days.
  • Nearly 1 in 5 (19%) of processes took over 1 year, and slightly less than 1 in 20 (4.4%) took over 2 years.
  • Nearly a quarter (23%) do not regularly submit data on disciplinaries to Trust Boards for scrutiny.
  • Over a third of Trusts (35%) do not mandate training for staff handling disciplinaries. 

The solution

Disciplinary investigations can be one of the most challenging professional experiences a doctor can have in their career. At Medical Protection, we support over 400 members a year in England who are involved in a disciplinary and we witness first-hand the range of pressures they experience, particularly when due process is not followed.

Based on our experience of assisting doctors, and from feedback from members, we have identified four themes for ensuring a ‘good’ disciplinary process. Within each of these themes we have identified specific areas where changes should be made. We hope these will act as a call to action and kickstart the debate that is needed to drive improvements.

Theme 1: Efficient

  1. Proportionate
    Trusts must consider whether a matter may be dealt with in a less formal manner before proceeding to an MHPS investigation. Any move to exclude the doctor from their duties must also be proportionate to the nature of the investigation.
  2. Timely
    When a doctor is put through a disciplinary process, it should begin and conclude in a timely manner.

Theme 2: Fair

  1. Fair treatment for all parties
    The doctor and their representatives should receive fair treatment during proceedings, with due process followed and all necessary disclosures made. NHS staff involved in carrying out the disciplinary processes should also receive adequate, specialised training; Trusts should not be relying on competence or experience. Dedicated time should be ring-fenced for those involved in an investigation to ensure that MHPS deadlines can be met.
  2. Free from bias and discrimination
    Steps must be taken to ensure discrimination and bias are not factors that can initiate a disciplinary investigation. Information about the importance of defence organisation and union membership should be highlighted at each induction to maximise the chances of a doctor being able to access appropriate support during an investigation.

Theme 3: Compassionate

  1. Considerate
    The wellbeing of the doctor subject to investigation should be considered at all times, and active steps taken to offer support and mentorship.
  2. Well communicated
    The disciplinary process should be communicated clearly and in plain language at the outset, and frequent communication should continue throughout, so doctors are aware of the status of the investigation and any delays.

Theme 4: Accountable

  1. Accountability of employers
    When a Trust or another employer is found to have behaved in a seriously wrong way during proceedings, a clear method needs to be established to hold them to account.
  2. Scrutiny
    Senior managers and Trust Boards should have greater knowledge and scrutiny of disciplinary processes. Standardised reporting and data collection, such as the inclusion of disciplinary processes in governance audits, should be rolled out.

Ceylan Simsek

Policy and Public Affairs Officer

Megan Bennett

Policy and Public Affairs Manager
New site feature tour

Introducing an improved
online experience

You'll notice a few things have changed on our website. After asking our members what they want in an online platform, we've made it easier to access our membership benefits and created a more personalised user experience.

Why not take our quick 60-second tour? We'll show you how it all works and it should only take a minute.

Take the tour Continue to site

Medicolegal advice
0800 561 9090
Membership information
0800 561 9000

Key contact details

Should you need to contact us, our phone numbers are always visible.

Personalise your search

We'll save your profession in the "I am a..." dropdown filter for next time.

Tour completed

Now you've seen all of the updated features, it's time for you to try them out.

Continue to site
Take again