Select country
Membership information
0800 561 9000
Medicolegal advice
0800 561 9090
Menu
Refine my search

NHS LA triennial report: Action needed to drive down cost of clinical negligence, says MPS

Post date: 21/07/2015 | Time to read article: 2 mins

The information within this article was correct at the time of publishing. Last updated 14/11/2018

NHS LA triennial report: Action needed to drive down cost of clinical negligence, says MPS 

In response to the Department of Health’s triennial review of the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA), the Medical Protection Society (MPS) is pleased that the cost of clinical negligence is recognised as an issue but wants to see a debate on the merits of a limit on future earnings and future care costs.1

The report states that the NHS LA is well led and efficient; but recommends a review of options around claimant costs and the long term affordability of damages levels. MPS believes this is an important recommendation; however there should be a wider debate about the potential benefits of limits on future earnings and future care costs in special damages awards.

In response to the Report, Emma Hallinan, Director of Claims and Litigation at MPS said:

“We now know that the NHS LA estimates that £28.3bn will be needed to cover known and future claims for clinical negligence for past patient care – up by 10% on last year. We are pleased the report agrees with us that fixed costs for small value clinical negligence claims are needed; the next step is to have a debate on the merits of a limit on on future earnings and future care costs in special damages awards.

“In our experience, special damages claims, such as compensation for future care costs and future earning capacity, have increased in recent years. We could learn from other countries; in some Australian states there are limits on the loss of earnings at typically a multiple of two or three times the average weekly earnings.

“As difficult decisions are made about what the NHS can afford, it is crucial that we ask ourselves whether it is appropriate and affordable to continue to pay such high costs in damages. MPS believes that these costs could be better spent on patient care for all.”

As part of its priorities for the government, MPS made four recommendations to tackle the rising cost of clinical negligence2:

  • A debate on the merits of a limit on special damages
  • Fixed costs for small value clinical negligence claims
  • An ultimate limitation period on bringing claims
  • Reform rules relating to claimant expert reports covered by ‘after the event’ insurance

For further information please contact Kim Watson, Media Relations Manager at MPS on 0207 399 1428 or email [email protected]

ENDS

Notes to Editor

1. Department of Health’s Triennial Review of the NHS Litigation Authority https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/nhs-ligitation-authority-2014-review

2. MPS’s ‘Priorities for the new government’ /uk/articles/priorities-for-the-new-government

Share this article

Share
New site feature tour

Introducing an improved
online experience

You'll notice a few things have changed on our website. After asking our members what they want in an online platform, we've made it easier to access our membership benefits and created a more personalised user experience.

Why not take our quick 60-second tour? We'll show you how it all works and it should only take a minute.

Take the tour Continue to site

Medicolegal advice
0800 561 9090
Membership information
0800 561 9000

Key contact details

Should you need to contact us, our phone numbers are always visible.

Personalise your search

We'll save your profession in the "I am a..." dropdown filter for next time.

Tour completed

Now you've seen all of the updated features, it's time for you to try them out.

Continue to site
Take again