MPS opposes GMC plans for harsher punishments
Post date: 19/11/2014 | Time to read article: 1 minsThe information within this article was correct at the time of publishing. Last updated 14/11/2018
The Medical Protection Society (MPS) opposes the GMC’s proposals to change its sanctions guidance and effectively dilute the discretion of Fitness to Practise Panels1. Some of the consultation proposals appear to represent a creeping extension of the role of the GMC and will prevent panels from using their experience and judgement to provide effective and proportionate oversight of the medical profession.
Dr Nick Clements, Head of Medical Services at MPS said: “We think that it is misjudged to change the current GMC sanctions in this way. It is crucial that panels are able to use discretion because it allows them to consider complaints on a case-by-case basis.
“These new proposals attempt to direct panels to reach specific decisions in certain types of cases. This is restrictive and inappropriate, and will prevent panels from using their discretion to make fair, balanced and considered decisions about sanctions. It is also likely to lead to an increase in decisions being challenged, potentially prolonging the process. Instead, the guidance should set down general principles for panels, which will then allow them to consider each case on its individual facts and merits.”
Dr Clements added: “The GMC’s consultation on sanctions is in addition to recent proposals to extend the GMC’s powers so that it can appeal decisions of its own panels. Taken together, we think these plans will undermine proportionate and consistent oversight of healthcare professional regulation.”
Further information
For further information or to interview Dr Clements, please contact Shannon Darling, Press Officer at MPS on +44 020 7399 1319 or email [email protected]
Notes to editors |
